-
Binance reportedly covered 95% of losses from the $3.3 billion hack.
-
The remaining 5% involves less liquid tokens that take longer to source and convert.
-
CZ says Binance used its balance sheet without borrowing, selling assets, or raising funds.
Binance has reportedly covered 95% of the losses linked to its $3.3 billion hack, with withdrawals among the top 10 assets restored. The remaining 5% involves less liquid tokens, making the final sourcing and conversion process slower.
CZ said Binance has already allocated 100% of the required funds. In other words, the outstanding issue isn’t an alleged funding shortfall. It’s converting the remaining allocation into smaller, less liquid assets.
That distinction matters. Getting the money allocated and completing the asset conversion aren’t necessarily the same thing.
Balance Sheet Funding Sets Binance Apart
Another detail deserves attention: Binance says it didn’t borrow money, sell assets, or raise fresh capital to cover the losses.
Instead, the exchange used its own balance sheet. That’s a significant part of the response, particularly when comparisons with other crypto industry incidents start flying around.
Still, covering losses doesn’t automatically erase the security concerns that follow a major hack. Investors may appreciate the financial commitment, but trust takes longer to rebuild.
Remaining Five Percent Still Needs Conversion
The final 5% is reportedly tied to tokens with thinner liquidity. Sourcing those assets takes time, even with the full funding allocation already in place.
For Binance, the immediate task is straightforward: finish converting the remaining assets and complete the recovery process. The Binance hack recovery effort has reached the reported 95% mark, but the final stretch still matters. Until that last portion is settled, the exchange has unfinished business.
Was this writing helpful?
Trust with CoinPedia:
CoinPedia has been delivering accurate and timely cryptocurrency and blockchain updates since 2017. All content is created by our expert panel of analysts and journalists, following strict Editorial Guidelines based on E-E-A-T (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness). Every article is fact-checked against reputable sources to ensure accuracy, transparency, and reliability. Our review policy guarantees unbiased evaluations when recommending exchanges, platforms, or tools. We strive to provide timely updates about everything crypto & blockchain, right from startups to industry majors.
Investment Disclaimer:
All opinions and insights shared represent the author's own views on current market conditions. Please do your own research before making investment decisions. Neither the writer nor the publication assumes responsibility for your financial choices.
Sponsored and Advertisements:
Sponsored content and affiliate links may appear on our site. Advertisements are marked clearly, and our editorial content remains entirely independent from our ad partners.